this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Tech News

1029 readers
7 users here now

What is this?

A new place to discuss Tech News

Rules

  1. No NSFW content
  2. No conspiracy theory articles
  3. No politics unless it involves tech
  4. Don't be mean!
  5. Nothing illegal can be posted here because it's illegal!
  6. Follow the post guidelines which are pinned in the community

Who runs this lemmy community?

Me! Sandro Linux, a youtuber who does tech news videos as well as other tech videos

Will any of these articles be used in your show?

If they are good yes :)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

did you read the article? the draft was voted on by a committee, so it had to be read by other people. honestly, work like this is perfect for LLMs like chatGPT. what is concerning about this for you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it isn't concerning to you, god help you. You'll find out soon enough why it should be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

why should it concern me? I don't understand the danger.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but it's the "secretly written" by ChatGPT that bothers me. Not the fact that ChatGPT can conceive of something and write it out. I'm not completely against AI, I realize we use it with Siri and Alexis and other apps all the time. Just the idea that a program can create something which APPEARS to be from a legitimate human actor and really isn't at all - and can even get it passed into law. That's the part that is frightening, in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fair point to make, and I mostly agree.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well AI is here to stay either way, it's just going to get more prevalent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because life requires actual human participation and you can't be a lazy asshole who lets AI, or anything else for that matter, do the living for you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here here. I agree with that also. However I'm starting to see a future where AI does pretty much everything for us and we turn into those fat blobs who just float around all day (what movie was that? With the robot E.T. looking dude?).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks! Sometimes my mind goes blank at the worst times. That's the movie I was thinking of.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, but this is work for language written in law. how does what you say tie into this scenario?

side note, I think everyone who believes what happened here is not good has never collaborated on writing a large document before.