this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
18 points (87.5% liked)

World News

33143 readers
808 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

..., dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory...

This you left out on purpose?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions

thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"

as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"

so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

what? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t