this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2021
24 points (87.5% liked)
Asklemmy
44656 readers
932 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Here is something I will throw, despite affirming to RMS in general. In an RT interview via video call, he called Xinjiang surveillance as China being repressive, completely ignoring the past 20 years of radicalisation and terrorism in China. Does he prefer that Uyghurs keep getting radicalised by Salafists, ruin their lives and kill others, or rather that they prosper with someone's aid?
Sometimes he has to learn to stop talking on issues he does not know about, since he even says he does not visit websites that have non free JS. Most of the exclusive interview information is locked onto there. How is he supposed to know that information, when he himself restricted his freedom of learning that information? His TV channels will not tell him the truth in Boston.