this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
104 points (96.4% liked)

World News

33158 readers
1256 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One of these claims is compatible with UNCLOS, the other absolutely is not. The US pulls plenty of international dickery, including not ratifying UNCLOS, but this claim fits within that existing international law just fine

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except it's not really compatible with UNCLOS.

The US interpretation of UNCLOS would allow them to claim like half the Pacific

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What do you think isn't in line with it? This isn't an exclusive economic zone claim.