this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1656 readers
314 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Choice quote:

Actually I feel violated.

It's a KYC interview, not a police interrogation. I've always enjoyed KYC interviews; I get to talk about my business plans, or what I'm going to do with my loan, or how I ended up buying/selling stocks. It's hard to empathize with somebody who feels "violated" by small talk.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (34 children)

So annoying. There are good conversations to have about overreach and surveillance but dude, organised crime is fucking terrifying and AML is good actually.

I like buying drugs, I think there are probably kinds of crimes that shouldn't be prosecutable by evidence discovered using methods intended to stop truly evil shit and we should probably talk about that. These people though, it's always something stupid they coyly hide while acting like it's some giant assault on their rights to be interviewed in order to establish they're not trafficking arms or something.

It doesn't make for a good case. I don't think trading in crypto is inherently less moral than like buying shares in shell and some of the freak outs about it are knee jerk moral panics (seriously though please stop speculating using my ketamine coins? I just want to treat my depression) but it's dumb to get so worked up about being asked a few questions when it looks absolutely sus as hell. If I walk down the street carrying a gun bag (full of flowers, the shape is convenient) in a balaclava (the wind dehydrates my skin) it's not a fucking assault on my rights if someone asks me to show them there isn't a rifle in my bag.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (29 children)

actively investing in shell and actively investing in crypto is unethical and it's not wrong to point it out, and neither is this moral panic; if you don't want to be subjected to ethical assessment, don't brag about potentially unethical behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@mawhrin @naevaTheRat

Investing in shell is arguably ethical if you're doing it to exert shareholder influence or just be a pain in their ass at annual meeting time.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)