Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2821 readers

226 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

153

Majority of debtors to US hospitals now people with health insurance (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

People with health insurance may now represent the majority of debtors American hospitals struggle to collect from, according to medical billing analysts.

This marks a sea change from just a few years ago, when people with health insurance represented only about one in 10 bills hospitals considered “bad debt”, analysts said.

“We always used to consider bad debt, especially bad debt write-offs from a hospital perspective, those [patients] that have the ability to pay but don’t,” said Colleen Hall, senior vice-president for Kodiak Solutions, a billing, accounting and consulting firm that works closely with hospitals and performed the analysis.

“Now, it’s not as if these patients across the board are even able to pay, because [out-of-pocket costs are] such an astronomical amount related to what their general income might be.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I mean..

Thanks Obama?

I get it. We're never supposed to criticize democrats.

But it sure does seem that at every opportunity to go hard, they as a team, simply don't.

Obama could have made single payer a priority. He could have made codifying RvW a priority. He could have made lots of things priorities, but he didn't. He made compromise his priority as if they were ever going to give him an inch. The only thing truly progressive about him was his marketing.

Not going full stop into your priorities has consequences. This is one of them.

The counterargument is always that the democrats don't have the votes, so they shouldn't try. Democratic strategy has put us into a ratcheting crab walk towards fascism and totalitarianism. This happens as a function of 'compromise' and as a function of the insistence we run 'safe' candidates, when realistically, you aren't capturing any centrist voters on a D ticket, ever, and haven't been since before they year 2000.

We need to kick the blue dogs out of the party and run leftists down ticket in ever race. We can't have spoilers taking D seats. They aren't D's but we're not giving the people of those places any other options. Let those blue dogs run as Republicans. They won't win. They're too moderate. Crab-walking the Democratic party further and further right trying to cater to a non-existent center is a major factor for why things are continually getting worse.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (10 children)

My understanding was that the plan was to baby step it in.

Start with getting everyone insured, then move on to patching things until the insurers are not part of it at all anymore, and it's just the medicare paying for it all, and being able to negotiate prices, and directly hire doctors themselves and buy out hospitals. The end goal would be for healthcare to become a service like the post office, with every address serviced regardless of the cost.

That was the dream rather.

Democrats had about 90 days in 2009 to get it done, not knowing that it would just be 90 days.

That was the last Democratic super-majority, republicans then went hard into State legislatures in order to gerrymander the US so that a Democratic super majority of both houses could never happen again.

They also went hard on the racism, because the southern strategy worked the first time.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

That was the last Democratic super-majority, republicans then went hard into State legislatures in order to gerrymander the US so that a Democratic super majority of both houses could never happen again.

I get that you are making these points in good faith, but its really not our job to make excuses for the inability of democrats to get the work they are elected to do, done. They can't keep getting apologized for on their own behalf. If these are the excuses they want to use, they need to be the ones to make them, because even these excuses demand further accountability.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The Democrats + Independents had this "super majority" for a very small amount of time and that's the only reason we even got ACA.

Americas problem is our democracy isn't representative and too many people who should be voting choose not to.

I can blame Obama and Dems for a lot but not this and I also can't discount all the good they've done.

You want better things get your friends, family, acquaintances, and neighbors to vote. Go canvas. Get an actual supermajority that stays around for at least a few years because that's what it now takes in our polarized country.

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (10 replies)