this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)
World News
89 readers
1 users here now
News from around the world!
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They did so rightfully. The public interest was way grater than the privacy rights here.
Agreed. Prostitution is legal, yet they were operating illegally, and subjecting clients to a deadly, transmissible disease.
These women essentially provided public services. If any other type of provider of services was endangering the public, there would be no quarrel with naming the guilty parties, so that people who used those services could assess the risk.
Just because the service was sex, doesn't mean the public should all the sudden be kept in the dark as to whom might be affected.
Exactly