this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
172 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

62117 readers
6722 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
172
The Pentagon Tried to Hide That It Bought Americans’ Data Without a Warrant (www.wired.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Pentagon Tried to Hide That It Bought Americans’ Data Without a Warrant::US spy agencies purchased Americans’ phone location data and internet metadata without a warrant but only admitted it after a US senator blocked the appointment of a new NSA director.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Warrants are important checks on an otherwise unchecked behemoth that could easily make most people disappear in one way or another.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As much as I hate it, I was under the impression that US government agencies routinely purchased user data from brokers because it was a workaround for warrant requirements to acquire the data themselves.

[–] kent_eh 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the real problem is that the data was made available for sale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the 'I singlehandedly thought it was the expected result" explanation. If true, still not helpful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the condescending prick with poor reading comprehension.