Asklemmy

44847 readers

1004 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is digitalocean good to host a lemmy instance that allows freedom of speech? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have a good experience with digitalocean when it comes to technical stuff, or computing stability, most of my apps hosted there are business related apps, has nothing to do with public opinion. but recently i decided to launch a lemmy instance that allows freedom of speech with very less restrictions, and i'm still thinking to put the service on digitalocean, but i dont know if digitalocean is good when it comes to freedom of speech, because i dont want to wake up at the morning and find that they blocked my account and deleted all my data because they didn`t like what my users are talking about.

Note: Less restrictions means (no pornography, child pornography, terrorist group and violence support, copyrighted materials trade).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Digitalocean is based in the United States, so if you host your instance there, you will have to follow the laws of that country to some degree (at least if the instance gets big enough for someone to notice). It will probably be similar if your instance is hosted in another country, and I dont think there is any country that is clearly neutral.

So my suggestion is to think about which countries your instance would mainly criticize, and then host in a "hostile" country. For example, if you want to criticize the United States, host in Russia or China as their governments wont care about that. Or vice versa.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

From what I've heard the US law is pretty okay in terms of freedom of speech if you aren't a direct threat to the US

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Yeah. Suuuure. Snowden. Assange. Daniel Hale. Chelsea Manning. Reality Winner. Countless others. Ring any bells?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

They were threatening the US so they had to go (according to the US)