this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
12 points (83.3% liked)
[Dormant, please move to [email protected]] Movies and TV Shows
2521 readers
2 users here now
Please move to [email protected]
This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.
Rules:
- Keep discussion civil and on topic.
- Please do not link to pirated content.
- No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
- Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Also there ended up being no point to the Mattel board drama. It didn't affect the plot at all and at the end it was still all men making decisions based on profit.
Perfect liberal movie, lip service without changing a thing.
That didn't happen in the movie though, there was no next step taken. America pitches the idea and the man in charge is about to say no until another man says it will make a lot of money. There's no implication of her being promoted or anything. The Mattel leadership doesn't change, the patriarchy doesn't change, and Barbieland didn't fundamentally change either. A couple characters changed their outlooks on themselves, which isn't a bad thing but it's also not that profound. The movie identifies some bigger problems but ends up just accepting them and moving on. And I think reading intention into that is probably giving the studio too much credit. Especially when you could replace the board with a literal roadblock and it wouldn't change anything about the rest of the plot. To be clear, I thought it was a fun movie, I just don't think it's as groundbreaking as many make it out to be.
In which case I would point to this part of my comment.
That and (speculation) I'm pretty sure most of the people making this movie are liberals themselves.