this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2022
4 points (75.0% liked)

Privacy

33192 readers
252 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I see it as on the same level of a vegan advocacy organisation working with one of the biggest meat companies in the world. Sure, the vegan org might reduce the suffering of the animals under their control, but that shouldn't be their goal, complete abolishment of animal agriculture should be.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

complete abolishment of animal agriculture is not done overnight with in one fell swoop. It's done with small changes here and there. Slowly forging a new culture where it is considered worse and worse to treat animals badly. (and what counts as animal abuse will start covering more and more things). Slowly changing the norm. Same goes for privacy, user rights, etc. There are of course some key moments, watershed moments, legislations (GDPR for example), but those had a long journey of tiny steps all over the world before they came into being. Sort of like tectonic plates building up tension over tens, hundreds, thousands of years before they snap into place in one huge earthquake

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago

I agree with you, but this is lemmy, and the majority see radical change as the only way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

It's an apt comparison, but do you want complete abolishment of all forms of telemetry, tracking or advertising? Or perhaps more relevant, is that Mozilla's goal? I don't think so. See this post by them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Yes, yes and yes. And Mozilla have been selling out their user's data since the day they took money from Google.

This is honestly what annoys me more than anything about Mozilla: they pretend to be champions for privacy, but they aren't. And people fall for it. They are controlled opposition. They are the social democrats of the privacy world: channeling privacy supporters into their compromise (and compromised) position and painting the radicals as unreasonable dreamers.

If they were to finally die, that would probably be good for online privacy. A real non-corrupt free software fork of chromium could take off with built-in ad blocking and actually good privacy defaults. Firefox is sucking the oxygen out of the room right now.

Ultimately all tracking and data collecting besides what's absolutely necessary needs to be declared 100% illegal. I have no hope Mozilla will help in this fight at all.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Starting from paragraph 2, I could replace "Mozilla" and "chromium" vice versa and your comment would actually hold true.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I just think that when Firefox dies, maintaining a chromium fork with Google tracking crap ripped out is going to be way easier than continuing development on Firefox, and can be done by way fewer people.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 years ago

Firefox will take down Tor Project with it. Chromium/Blink is that bad. Also, Firefox allows user.js and userchrome.css modifications, something unparalleled in Blink/WebKit world.

Firefox is not going anywhere. Google is scared of antitrust and antimonopoly lawsuits.