this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2022
2 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44672 readers
844 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least for me its very difficult to make the line between preventing hate speech and allowing the freedom. I'm thinking to launch a lemmy instance, but the targeted audience is very sensitive to religion topics, and i'm sure if i allow it, this could lead to hate speech at some point and may fuel violence. Also, from my prospective, i just want my audience find new good things far from porn, porn sites are a lot, and i don`t want to mix it with other topics that can very constructive.

So please tell me your opinion, if banning these 2 topics can effect the freedom of speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Since you're the instance hoster you have the right to decide what you want your instance to be used for (and not to be used for).

The system is federated, and those who don't agree by the rules can post on another instance if they don't like it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Since you’re the instance hoster you have the right to

Not sure that's a helpful factoid. He does indeed have that right (in most countries). But he also has a right to use a cheese grater on his dick. It's just "not recommended".

The system is federated, and those who don’t agree by the rules can post on another instance if they don’t like it.

Email itself is federated, and is the canonical example of federation. I believe that the Mastodon and Fediverse itself uses it as the goto example when explaining themselves to journalists.

But email isn't an open system where anyone can connect anymore. Only gigantic companies are allowed to participate on a meaningful level. Anyone else who attempts to do so finds it impossible, and if they complain about it, they are met with derisive rebuttals about how only spammers would want to do that anyway. "Just get gmail!"

The fediverse needs to figure out how to deal with that particular endgame, but it won't even be obvious that it's a problem until it is already impossible to do something about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago

he also has a right to use a cheese grater on his dick

Infallible logic right there lmao