this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
157 points (99.4% liked)
Technology
61394 readers
4370 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've started to think that the biggest indication that someone is competent / trustworthy or not is their willingness to take responsibility for stuff going wrong. I get that we're all a product of our upbringing and society and free will may well be an illusion, but people should still be willing to say "It happened while I was responsible, so it's my fault and I should have done more to prevent it.". Even then, in an organization stuff going wrong is more a matter of rules and systems, there should be a system in place that actively makes accidents impossible; but it's different when you're literally the person in charge of the organization.
When a companies go bankrupt, a lot of the time CEOs give interviews where they discuss "market conditions", what's what this reminds me of.