this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
12 points (80.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

660 readers
260 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I showed you a graph of production and nonsupervisory wages compared with inflation. That's not "rich peoples' money" — it's just regular pay.

Your personal situation might be different, say because you haven't changed jobs and your boss thinks you won't do so to get better wages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inflation is apparently a bad indicator of actual cost of living because wages have not kept up with housing and food prices. Wages need to far exceed inflation to catch up to 90s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inflation is based on a broad measure of all the things people buy.

Food and housing are a big part of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, but it's not all of it. Inflation includes a ton of things that don't affect people in the same capacity Last year inflation was like 7% but grocery prices were up 30%. Housing also far exceeded that, too

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one thing is all of it because people don't buy Only One Thing. Food prices did rise a lot, but people don't buy only food. So the overall cost of living didn't rise nearly so much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Right. But people buy a lot more of One Thing than the Other Thing so when the One Thing is 30% more expensive and the Other Thing is down in price, the average of the two doesn't tell the whole story

My expenses are mostly food and housing and I know for millions of people, it's ONLY food and housing.