this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
603 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

62012 readers
4353 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google is making a map of methane leaks for the whole world to see::Google will use satellite data, AI, and its computing power to map methane emissions around the globe. The transparency marks a new era in climate accountability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would be simple for smart phone manufacturers to have an air quality tester built into the phone. Everyone being able to measure how crappy the air around them is and be notified when it’s unhealthy would push action on environmental care, reduction in cars etc

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you ever seen an air quality tester? Especially one that can tell between different kinds of pollutants? They are not exactly pocket compatible

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like we need to make bigger pockets

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Pockets are only replaceable by bigger pockets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consumer grade Air Quality Index devices give off crazy readings from things you wouldn't think they would. If a normal reading indoors is about 100, someone walking by with perfume on can spike it to 450 for a few seconds. Someone using a cleaning product to wipe down a table can spike it to 250. Someone cooking meal can spike it to 400.

None of those are things we're looking to change, but would show up in your readings you're proposing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How high does a good fart get it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/ZQdlFfSq1kw?si=XZiMVvPBxiZemYwd

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can already see this on air quality maps and such anyway. People just don't care.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think people probably care quite a lot, actually. What're you basing that statement off of?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That this information is already readily available to the masses, and it hasn't changed anyone's behavior. It certainly appears that most people don't care.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, it might seem that way but evidence suggests otherwise: https://www.undp.org/press-releases/worlds-largest-survey-public-opinion-climate-change-majority-people-call-wide-ranging-action

This is more likely evidence of the lack of awareness people have of data like this, rather than a disinterest in the topic. Just because it's readily available, doesn't mean people know about it. Also, don't confuse a lack of interest in viewing data on air quality as a lack of interest in air quality itself. Those are not the same thing.