Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Victoria's Giant Trees (with photos) (victoriasgianttrees.weebly.com)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The regrowth trees that are among the tallest in the state are found in ideal conditions, usually at a low altitude, near a protected gully, and a permanent stream.
The tallest regrowth tree reached 92.4m before being killed by bushfires.
After the bushfires, there is now a sea of 10-15m tall regrowth trees under towering dead trunks.
Some of the tallest trees in a patch of tall forest near Beenak exceed 80m in height.
The tallest living trees in Victoria are a combination of older trees and those that began their lives following fires in the 1920s and 1930s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing, that was a nice read. There is something incredible about standing at the base of a 90m tree, awe inspiring. I can't help to think back to a time when the southern parts of Australia were awash with giant trees, and then the Europeans came and could not cut them down fast enough.

Is there anywhere that shows what forest coverage would have looked like in Australia prior to European settlement?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Most of the photos I used to chase down were usually of cleared areas with remaining large dead trees and one had to guess.

The lost website of large Victorian trees had a great photo of a woman standing outside of her hut, cleared up to her front door and behind the house was a wall of trees. The photographer, to get the trees in frame, was hundreds of metres away and she, and the hut, were just a tiny fraction of the picture. With that photo was a diary entry of someone that lived near one of the giant forests (maybe her, I can't remember) writing about how scared she was at night, every now and again, hearing something fall in the forest and the noise it made. The amount of carbon stored in those forests must have been momentous compared to the grass and cows today.

https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/pre-colonial-australia-natural-wilderness-or-gentleman-s-park

First Nations managed grasslands fairly extensively so the forest wasn't as dense as people imagine in areas, except where fire and people couldn't penetrate.

I added a photo of a ringbark to this community earlier, did you see that photo?