this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
203 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

61632 readers
4585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Lemmy doesn't, since it's not part of the protocol, and in both situations you still lose your actual id.

In general, there's technical reasons why ids and instances are associated on Lemmy / Mastodon, but not UX reasons.

99% of users just want a username, i.e. @bigCommieMouth, they don't necessarily want their identity tied together with the server they use to interact with the network, i.e. @[email protected], and if they did really love a specific server and wanted their identity tied to it, they could always just make @bigCommieMouth_kolektiva_social.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Lemmy uses activitypub, but every implementation of activitypub has disparate features.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

>there’s technical reasons why ids and instances are associated on Lemmy / Mastodon, but not UX reasons.

...right...

>99% of users just want a username,

literally 100% of users have used this system regardless of the fact that identities are tied to services.

[–] masterspace 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

So? 100% of users never used the fediverse before it existed. Bluesky / ATProtocol is now offering an alternative where usernames are not tied to instances, and that sounds like a better UX.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] masterspace 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you don't want to discuss the relative merits of Bluesky, don't participate in a thread on Bluesky.

bye

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i thought this thread was about me correcting misunderstandings about activitypub software. i have no interest in bluesky until/unless they either aferro gpl their code or implement activitypub federation. there are no merits to their network that i can see unless one or both of those come to pass.

[–] masterspace 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

i thought this thread was about me correcting misunderstandings about activitypub software

I don't see a title saying "self post: let me correct you about the activitypub protocol", I see a link to Bluesky launching federated storage.

there are no merits to their network that i can see unless one or both of those come to pass

Then don't engage in a discussion about their identity system, just post a blanket comment saying "they suck cause they're not open enough" and leave the thread. The rest of us are here discussing the relative merits of one protocol vs another.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

don't tell me what to do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

> don’t engage in a discussion about their identity system,

I only discussed activitypub