this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2022
89 points (84.0% liked)
Privacy
34059 readers
1375 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I tried a couple more:
..looks like DDG has an undocumented NOT operator, which for some reason is not deactivated when in a long quote, but is deactivated when the phrase is bracketed in quoted nothings. "" ""
But still doesn't quite explain how
"why not signal" dessalines
does return a result."regex is hard", I guess.
Not many results contain signal Search only for dessalines why "signal"?
) gives a clue thatnot
has a special interpretation and that the parsing algorithm is very confused about what it's being told to do.Tinfoil hat or Hanlon's razor? :-P
Wow! You are on to something. I triedit with a couple of search strings and it looks like the not operator is working, e.g.
reeperbahn not hamburg
returns results which are not related to hamburg. And two quotes will ignore the not operator