this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
433 points (95.6% liked)

Memes

48879 readers
1797 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Obligatory fuck Nintendo, but don't make too much light out of this lawsuit. They're aren't attacking the legality of emulation itself (which has a ton of precedent defending it) but are instead trying to convince a judge that Yuzu is a DRM circumvention tool.

If they land a technologically-inept judge that believes decryption itself constitutes circumvention regardless of how it's used in the bigger picture, there's a decent chance the argument might have some teeth. Or, because there's no precedent for this, the lawsuit will drag on until Yuzu runs out of money and is forced to settle.

If it's within your financial means, please donate to Yuzu. If they lose this lawsuit, the precedent it sets will open up other emulators that work with encrypted ROMs (e.g. Dolphin and Ryujinx) to similar lawsuits.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think it's about money, just like with Vanced. Google didn't care for the hacked YouTube client before the team behind the mod tried to make money off of it. Now Yuzu did the same and Nintendo went after them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tachiyomi didn't try to monetize tho, still got taken down

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Tachiyoumi is a different case, they absolutely could win but didn't have resources to go to court.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did they try to monetize?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Patron that boomed with totk being leaked, but that's hardly their issue

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

what did they do?