this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2022
50 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

35760 readers
280 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Optimizer is good but it's a bit hard to use and lacks any kind of explanation, I'd recommend Bloatbox to the average user. It removes all the ads and all telemetry you can disable, as well as opt for removing potentially useless apps Windows forces on you. It also runs Windows10Debloater as an extra measure: https://github.com/builtbybel/bloatbox

In terms of "windows-like" Linux operating systems I'd avoid ones that literally copy Windows, more often than not they don't have good support and are kind of awkward, check out Zorin OS, it's really polished and comes pre-installed with Wine and is very user friendly to people coming from Windows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Well, I don't find the Optimizer that bad or difficult to use, at least for me it has been quite useful. I know that there are several apps to remove the desire to spy of Windows, advanced users can even get it without external apps through GodMode that comes with Windows itself by default (although naturally poorly documented), perhaps also with PowerShell. Windows itself is very configurable, although it is not through the Control Panel, most of the settings are deliberately very hidden, but accessible. MS conforms and trusts that 90% of users do not know them.

Respect to the Windows imitations, ok, it's a bit of self-deception, although there is a big difference between LinuxFX, which is quite successful, and poor attempts like ReactOS, which has not come out of alpha for more than 10 years to make a poor Windows XP fork and is used as an insider joke by MS devs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

poor attempts like ReactOS, which has not come out of alpha for more than 10 years to make a poor Windows XP fork

Don't talk shit about a project you demonstrably know next to nothing about. The ReactOS devs reverse engineered lots of Windows code without looking at it to prevent copyright infringement. They also contributed a lot to WINE which in turn enables lots of users switch to Linux.

You're simply not the target audience for ReactOS. It's rather an ecosystem to explore the Win32 API and run legacy applications on a completely reverse engineered system. See also, this forum thread: https://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19782 with a few links where you can educate yourself on the scope of ReactOS.

Comparing this to LinuxFX which basically is a reskin of upstream distributions is plain insulting to the ReactOS devs who arguably have a lot harder job than some kids mashing together software they didn't write.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I personally think that React os is a very cool project. It is unstable but still easier to use than windows . . . .

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)