Zerush

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

(???) I can't reproduce it with my Vivaldi 7.2, (full settings with extensions and 14 open tabs). Some settings or security soft in your OS may cause the slowdown of your browser. I use Vivaldi as main Browser and as second (vanilla) Zen Browser (Gecko), which is way slower.

Anyway, it's not so important the results of these Benchmarks (the differences in modern browsers are milliseconds), but in realworld workflow, the difference to need extern apps and extensions, or to have all at hand with inbuild features and tools.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

No issues in Vivaldi (it's a ungoogled Chromium)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Some are even crap

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's mainly the price nowadaysm eg, Google and M$ have the biggest FOSS catalogues out there, doft full with their tracking APIs, GitHub is owned by M$, even Facebook develope a lot of FOSS, same Amazon and other big corporations. Yes, feedom that everybody can use this products, same as also Freeware, proprietary or not. Freedom has nothing to do with this. The only freedom a normal user have is that he can fork FOSS, but only if he have the needed skills, if not, he have to trust the author and his intentions. Are you capable to audit a big complex soft and to fork and maintan it to your like? In this case, congrats.

We currently see the trust of FOSS in Firefox from Mozilla, turning in an advertising company, we see it in Brave sharing data with fishy crypto companies. FOSS distributed with dozends of different licenses, more o less restrictives and even copyrights. The current definition of FOSS is turning in pretty debatable and certainly has to do very few with Freedom nor romanticism.

Competition and market are the ones that put the rules, everything else is heavenly music. only valid for some indie apps from particular devs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Non freeware FOSS don't exist, FOSS - Free Open Source Soft, is always free, but there are non freeware OpenSource apps, like eg. Proton VPN, which is OpenSource but not Freeware, only Freemium (server cost money), or also Filen, it's also only Freemium OpenSource, if you need more than 10GB storage, you have to pay for it. There are also paid OpenSource apps without free version.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Spain said it more than a Year ago, promoting Gaza as independent State.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (9 children)

FOSS is always Freeware, but Freeware isn't always FOSS. Freeware don't mean other thing that the soft is free to use, nothing more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

In this case the only alternative is to use Vivaldi instead of FF forks, it has an own EE2E no knowledge sync in all devices.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ten golden rules for Procrastination

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Searching the Video with Andi and watching it in the search result, anonym, sandboxed and random proxie, without ads.

https://i.vgy.me/is6tEG.png

3
Cars (youtube.com)
 

Andisearch Writeup

The Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) paradox demonstrates a stark contradiction between quantum mechanics and local realism through an "all-versus-nothing" test of quantum nonlocality[^1]. First proposed in 1989 by Daniel Greenberger, Michael Horne, and Anton Zeilinger for four particles, the paradox was refined to three particles in 1990 with input from Abner Shimony[^1].

The paradox centers on the GHZ state, a highly entangled quantum state of three or more qubits, typically written as:

|GHZ⟩ = (|000⟩ + |111⟩)/√2

For three photons, this represents a superposition where all photons are either horizontally polarized (HHH) or vertically polarized (VVV)[^1].

The key elements that create the paradox are:

  1. Perfect correlations between measurements on separated particles
  2. EPR's definition of "elements of reality"
  3. The assumption of local realism

The contradiction emerges through a set of four quantum mechanical predictions[^1]:

Y₁Y₂X₃|GHZ⟩ = +|GHZ⟩
Y₁X₂Y₃|GHZ⟩ = +|GHZ⟩
X₁Y₂Y₃|GHZ⟩ = +|GHZ⟩
X₁X₂X₃|GHZ⟩ = -|GHZ⟩

These predictions are incompatible with any local hidden variable theory, where measurements must have definite classical values. The mathematical contradiction appears because in quantum mechanics:

Y₁Y₂X₃ · Y₁X₂Y₃ · X₁Y₂Y₃ · X₁X₂X₃ = -1

While in local hidden variable theories, this product must equal +1[^1].

Recent developments have expanded the GHZ paradox beyond its original formulation:

  • Multi-setting versions allow observers to measure more than two observables[^2]
  • Extensions to higher-dimensional quantum systems (qudits) have been developed[^9]
  • Applications in quantum communication, cryptography, and secret sharing protocols have emerged[^1]

The first experimental observation of GHZ correlations was achieved by Anton Zeilinger's group in 1998, work that contributed to his share of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics[^1].


[^1]: Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state - Wikipedia

[^2]: Multisetting Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradoxes

[^9]: Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger paradoxes from qudit graph states

(😐 I think that the percentage of quantum physicists who require high doses of medication is especially high.)

208
Kids (lemmy.ml)
 
 
 

Andisearch Writeup

A security researcher known as Brutecat discovered a vulnerability that could expose the email addresses of YouTube's 2.7 billion users by exploiting two separate Google services[^1][^2]. The attack chain involved extracting Google Account identifiers (GaiaIDs) from YouTube's block feature, then using Google's Pixel Recorder app to convert these IDs into email addresses[^1].

To prevent notification emails from alerting victims, Brutecat created recordings with 2.5 million character titles that broke the email notification system[^1]. The exploit worked by intercepting server requests when clicking the three-dot menu in YouTube live chats, revealing users' GaiaIDs without actually blocking them[^2].

Brutecat reported the vulnerability to Google on September 15, 2024[^1]. Google initially awarded $3,133, then increased the bounty to $10,633 after their product team reviewed the severity[^1]. According to Google spokesperson Kimberly Samra, there was no evidence the vulnerability had been exploited by attackers[^2].

Google patched both parts of the exploit on February 9, 2025, approximately 147 days after the initial disclosure[^1].

[^1]: Brutecat - Leaking the email of any YouTube user for $10,000 [^2]: Forbes - YouTube Bug Could Have Exposed Emails Of 2.7 Billion Users

view more: next ›