this post was submitted on 01 May 2021
1 points (100.0% liked)

cryptocurrency

2726 readers
8 users here now

The largest cryptocurrency community on the Fediverse!

Lemmy community dedicated to cryptocurrency news, technicals, education, memes and so more!

💬 Chat on Community Improvements and Development

Community Knowledge Base:

Be nice, have fun.

Community rules:

General lemmy.ml instance rules applicable here too.

Ugly brother of this community: bωockchain

For a community devoted to cryptography itself, visit c/cryptography

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 10,000 mAh power bank is able to run 10 validators (including Geth + Rocket Pool) on a Raspberry Pi for 10 hours.

The Pi consumes 5 watts, so that comes to around 0.1 KWh’s of energy per day for 10 validators, or 0.01KWh per validator.

That 3600x more energy efficient than Bitcoin PoW, or, put another way, a 99.97% reduction in power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

If proof of stake was to use only 1% of processing power where proof of work would have used 100%. What prevents people from running 100 times more proof of stake nodes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

to use only 1% of processing power where proof of work would have

Each validator is required to lock up 32 eth. If the validator miss-behaves they will lose some of there deposit (or all depending on the violation).

Now 32 eth is a lot of money, most ppl don't have that much. But if you have less you still help participate in securing the network and transitioning to PoS. There is a decentralized staking pool, lido that allows multiple ppl to pool together there eth until it reaches a multiple of 32 which is then bound. There are also centralized pool that allow you to do the same but you need to trust whatever entity that is running the pool. So I think contributing to centralized pool doesn't necessary contribute to the decentralization and security of the protocol.