this post was submitted on 01 May 2021
1 points (100.0% liked)
cryptocurrency
2726 readers
8 users here now
The largest cryptocurrency community on the Fediverse!
Lemmy community dedicated to cryptocurrency news, technicals, education, memes and so more!
💬 Chat on Community Improvements and Development
Community Knowledge Base:
Be nice, have fun.
Community rules:
- No Spam
- No ads
- No aggressive coin promotion or attacks on others
- No ICOs / IEOs / STOs / token (pre)sales / scam schemes promotion
- No trading/buying crypto discussions
- No promotion of trading groups, courses, signal groups, or other trade groups
- No pumping and shilling
- No casinos, giveaways, faucets, begging
- No price speculation posts
- No trolling
General lemmy.ml instance rules applicable here too.
Ugly brother of this community: bωockchain
For a community devoted to cryptography itself, visit c/cryptography
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If proof of stake was to use only 1% of processing power where proof of work would have used 100%. What prevents people from running 100 times more proof of stake nodes?
Each validator is required to lock up 32 eth. If the validator miss-behaves they will lose some of there deposit (or all depending on the violation).
Now 32 eth is a lot of money, most ppl don't have that much. But if you have less you still help participate in securing the network and transitioning to PoS. There is a decentralized staking pool, lido that allows multiple ppl to pool together there eth until it reaches a multiple of 32 which is then bound. There are also centralized pool that allow you to do the same but you need to trust whatever entity that is running the pool. So I think contributing to centralized pool doesn't necessary contribute to the decentralization and security of the protocol.