βΌοΈ The terrorist attack in Moscow is a planned and deliberate provocation by the Russian special services at the behest of Putin.
βοΈ Its purpose is to justify even tougher strikes on Ukraine and total mobilization in Russia.
βοΈ The public execution of people in Moscow should be understood as Putin's threat of an even greater escalation and expansion of the war.
β«οΈ Peskov's statement about the "war" shortly before the terrorist attack was just a false start of a carefully planned Kremlin special operation.
βοΈ Putin has a lot of experience in organizing such terrorist attacks as a way to strengthen his own power, starting with blowing up houses on the Kashirskyi highway. As then, today's action of intimidation of the Russians will be the reason for the maximum "tightening of the nuts" in Russia itself.
π Obviously, the Kremlin can accuse Ukraine of organizing a terrorist attack and use the shooting of its own citizens as a pretext for even more brutal attacks on civilian infrastructure and the killing of Ukrainian civilians. Today's attack on the civilian infrastructure of Ukraine is another link in the escalation initiated by Putin.
π₯ Putin has repeatedly tried to intimidate the West, including using nuclear weapons. So this terrorist attack can be used as another "pretext" for increasing aggression.
βοΈ However, the unhindered movement of a group of militants with assault rifles through the center of Moscow, as well as a lot of other indisputable evidence, indicate that the shooting at "Crocus City Hall" was organized by Russian special services. International embassies also warned about the preparation of a terrorist attack.
βΌοΈ It is obvious to the whole world that the terrorist attack in Moscow is another crime committed by Putin to maintain his own power.
And Nixon was going to win the election in a landslide, there was no need at all to break into the Watergate Hotel.
Still did it though because he was a paranoid piss baby
While all that may be true, this isn't Putin's first reelection. And he already dealt with Navalny, so the point was already made. I'm not saying he's subtle, but he has a lot of experience on this front, and I don't think he would waste the effort for the election when he has a war that needs to be supported.
I personally think this was done by IS but Putin isn't one to not take advantage of a disaster for his personal gain, even if he didn't orchestrate it.