this post was submitted on 15 May 2022
8 points (90.0% liked)
COVID-19 Pandemic
1028 readers
16 users here now
Any news or discussion around the pandemic. Anti-vaccination posts and comments will be removed, as well as personal attacks.
Relevant:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, I know my numbers, no surprise here. Also IMO the headline is a classic example of all the fearmongering that's been going on.
61,000/250,000 = 61/250 = 24.4%
So not even 1/4 of those under the age 65 that died of COVID-19 are also younger than 50 years old. And considering all ages, those under age 50 total to
61,000/1,000,000 = 61 / 1000 = 6.1%
which is definitely not more than I expected.
But I guess the main takeaway from the article is:
In numbers:
Which is commented like this
leaving out the flip side, which is that even though mortality for younger people increased more than that for older people, in total it still is not going to amount to much because the absolute mortality numbers for young people are very low.
This is especially true for actual young people under age 30. If you are under 30 years old, it's more likely that you die in a traffic accident than with COVID-19...
I'd rather have an article with a headline like: "Cars deadlier than COVID-19 for young people" posted to c/fuck_cars.