Technology

63009 readers

6236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

314

People left seriously creeped out after woman shares how to find out everything Google knows about you (www.uniladtech.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

123 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Its already established that the mic always hot, and that data is always being sent to the server.

Tell me, how have you established this? What were your methods?

By calling out for the Google assist, without having pushed any button first. It's always listening for the activate/initiate key phrase.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean it's sending anything out through the network connection. The wake word is locally processed.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t mean it’s sending anything out through the network connection. The wake word is locally processed.

Doesn't mean it's not, either.

This old article from Vice seems to have proven it, back in 2018.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This entire article is full of absolutely nothing but speculation with no sources and poor experimentation without proper knowledge in the field, software, or equipment. No technical analysis at all. This person kind of has no clue and is taking ignorant shots in the dark to try to confirm preexisting notions. The "experiment" they ran sounds like something my mother would do and then get all bent out of shape and frantically call me about it.

I want the 5 minutes back I wasted reading that.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I want the 5 minutes back I wasted reading that.

All of your hyperbole aside, if you're worried about time wasted, you really shouldn't be on the Internet.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~