this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
248 points (98.1% liked)

World News

33076 readers
741 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

People, the defendant had a history of using 👍to accept a contract with the aggrieved. Had done it NP a dozen times before. He was trying to use a technicality to weasel out of breaching a contract he obviously agreed to when he couldn’t fulfill it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Not only that but by the end of the contract price was up, so farmer would not make as much as on the free market.

load more comments (3 replies)