this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2021
16 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
33175 readers
527 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wish it was built in Android kernel too so it would consume less battery
Would this affect battery consumption though? The Wireguard protocol basically does not send/receive anything (when persistent keepalive is disabled, which it is by default) unless your phone actually wants to send something, and with Androids VPN API I think it mostly is as power efficient as it can be. As far as I understand having it in the Kernel only really provides performance (speed) gains, and maybe tighter integration into the overall Android ecosystem
Speed gains means at equal bandwidth less CPU use, hence more power efficient. How much of an impact that has in real-world scenarios, no idea ;)
You raise a good point. I'm actually not sure.
Hmm, it might be on newer versions? Not sure, but in general it is build into the Linux kernel these days. I think the main problem is that most Android devices ship with outdated kernel versions.
https://www.xda-developers.com/google-adds-wireguard-vpn-android-12-linux-kernel-5-4/