this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2022
8 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
46336 readers
794 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, kind of. It's not always realistic, but it's also not super realistic to just say "well fuck, nobody reads contracts anyway, let's just let the courts decide what's fair." The courts decide in extreme cases of unconscionability, and in those cases, "there's no way they read it" is a very small factor, but yeah, if you don't want to be screwed, read.
One thing to note: most websites these days use arbitration clauses making it very hard to sue them. The Netscape case by Sotomayor helps with this, but not really since that was clickwrap and here you're continually using a service. The WhatsApp terms are especially bad, as they allow facebook to upload all of your contacts to their servers (for some reason), and include a lot of other extreme clauses.
There are a few services like "Terms of Service Didn't Read" that help to tell you which services have bad terms and which ones have awful terms, but good ToU are extremely rare.