this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
203 points (94.3% liked)

General Discussion

12456 readers
11 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ok, imagine this, you are on reddit (say, a slow hobby focused subreddit), everybody there is nice and knowledgeable, and one day, the mods there announced that since there is not enough "content" on the sub, they are going to use a bot to repost content from 9gag in order to "bolster engagement" and "grow the community".

How would you feel about that?

If you feel upset and grossed out, you're exactly right.

I don't think there is a single non-spam subreddit where that kind of behavior would be tolerated without being called out for blatant mod abuse. No community in the world would ever tolerate automated reposting from another website, not reddit, not 4chan, not any forums of any size, even 9gag, I repeat, BLOODY 9GAG, was tired of being called out for reddit reposting and started making original content.

So why exactly should this kind of behavior be tolerated here?

Now, I'm sure some mods here did it with good intentions, but again, the road to the hell that is modern reddit is PAVED with good intentions. Content for the sake of content is bad, and we already knew it is bad, which is why Gallowboob was so thoroughly disliked, he generates """"""content"""""", in other words, spam that drowns out the normal people who can't compete with a professional marketer, much less a bot, which is exactly the reason why "Just block the bots" doesn't work, because it ruins the genuine engagements on a forum by drawing people to the lowest common denominator of """""""""""content""""""""""""".

Reddit, over the years, has turned into a platform for "bolstering engagement" for advertisers, and it does that by algorithmically stoking conflicts between people so they would endlessly argue and doomscroll. Why would we want that here? Now, I think most of us like the Lemmy/kbin right now because of the lack of bots here, and the conversations happen naturally and genuinely. I've even seen people here try to engage the bots, not realizing that they would never get a response out of them, because it felt normal to just talk about things.

(Eat your robot hearts out, @L4s and @BotIt)

Suppose then, if this repost bot situation was indeed temporary, why would people want to make original content if they are just going to be drowned out by bots? What's to stop someone from turning on bots from /r/dankmemes or /r/tiktokcringe? The bots are not members of the community, because they are not people (save the /r/botsright joke for more appropriate times), and over time, we will just become dependent on the bots hosing us down directly from that burning dumpster fire and become doomscrolling addicts again.

That's the number two lesson from the failure of Voat: that repost bots, like hate, should also not be tolerated, and Reddit will never die if we keep feeding it.

Everybody here are still currently all "Oh fuck reddit, fuck spez, I deleted my reddit account and all of my comments and will never go back again", but after finally getting away from reddit, why are you so insistent on trying to turn this place back to the worst part of reddit again?

And if the reddit migration on July 1st does indeed occur, do you think they would be ecstatic to see a place that's mostly reddit reposts, but with less """""""""""""""""""content"""""""""""""""""""? If they wanted reddit, why wouldn't they just go back to reddit?

When will we finally be rid of reddit, if we are the ones keeping it on life support?

I will say, if I sound frustrated, it's because I am frustrated, because I actually can't believe I even had to say this. Judging from the comments on this thread yesterday, I think a majority of people here would agree with me. We have something good here, and I'd like to keep it that way a bit longer.

Now, I very much appreciate that our admins here at lemmy.world and their amazing job of preemptively blocking suspicious bot infested instances, so I'm asking politely for @ruud, @Antik and the rest of our good admin team here to put their foot down on not allowing reddit repost spambots and nip this problem in the bud before it takes root, so I can get back to shitposting in peace.

Be better than reddit.

Burn reddit down.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Agree, we should start banning repost bots.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I block every reddit reposting bot I see. I left reddit for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, and we should keep them out. The no Nazi in punk bar story still applies here.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

+80% of my bans on my sub were re-post bots.

They are relentless and annoying AF...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reddit has enough repost bots as-is, last thing we need is bots reposting stuff from Reddit. Let's not become another component of the Inhuman Centipede.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

That's a hilarious yet way too descriptive image.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Hi @[email protected] - you already saw my post on this in the l4s thread but I thought it would be good to post it here too.

We agree that we don't want bots blindly importing from other news sources, be it reddit or others.

Bots in general should be allowed, as long as:

  • they follow the lemmy.world guidelines on content moderation
  • they have the approval from the community moderator/owner they post in
  • they are clearly identifying as a bot
  • they are not "spammy"
  • they are not used for advertisement

Malicious bots and bots going against these rules should be reported and they will be banned.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Gonna play devil's advocate on this, reposts are very welcome in communities when the content is less personal and prone to discussion. The only thing that I can think of that fits this description is porn, but then again that's half of reddit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It may change after 1 July.

Also, you can just browse your subscribed communities instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unless one of your subscribed communities is a victim of this spam. That's kinda rough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I haven't noticed that happening much. In fact, most of the lemmy spam bots I've seen have all been in their own instances, eg lemmy.link and lemmit.online.

However, if it's a subscribed community that you specifically want then you should contact that community's moderators. If they won't take action, then unsubscribing is always an option.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Weird part is we've had better solutions than that for a long time.

If automatically fetching content from reddit is something someone is set on, the best solution in my opinion is something like a digest bot. I.e., here's your daily/weekly/monthly post with the top threads from other communities (like reddit, or other non-federated systems). If you want to talk about any of those threads, you can talk about it in the digest post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And Lemmit.online is that for the fediverse. But lemmy.world is not that, and should not be that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

To my understanding, Lemmit does every individual comment. A digest is usually more like a single post per day (or whatever time period) fetching a limited amount of the most popular content. So, instead of every single comment on the steamdeck subreddit federating over on lemmit, you'd have say... links and titles for the top 5 that day show up as a singular text post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would also fix the issue of spam/junk posts that get brought over automatically by those bots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, would solve most of the problems people have with the lemmit system. I'm honestly kind of surprised someone hasn't ran with the concept. Kind of like a variation on sneakpeekbot from reddit but posting it's details automatically on a schedule instead of in response to a mention and filtering it's searches to a time period.

Hmm, I wonder who maintains that bot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Agree, flooding is an existential danger for social media.
As a side note, they're doing a good job of burning it down on their own, let's leave them at it and focus on building something good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd say they need curation.

There's thousands of posts getting botted over, but maybe five of those have useful content. Most of the time, the good stuff was in the comments. All that needs doing is a team going through what the bot posts and pruning the junk.

There have been some of those posts that were more than just links to a title on reddit. And there's the image posts like from r/funny where (despite me thinking they're dumb as hell) it is content that is forum neutral. So an outright no repost bots rule isn't any more ideal than them having no restrictions at all.

Like, best of legal advice, as an example. Useless bot because all it does is link back to legal advice posts without any of the comments from BOLA these made the sub entertaining. Stuff like that can go and nobody is missing out. But, stuff like r/art, the value is in the posts, so blanket banning that is a loss.

This needs manual curation like r/goodlongposts used to have until reddit pissed off the human that was doing the curation. Curation works for aggregation and reposts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I respectfully disagree. Curation is impossible with spam, since the moderators are the ones who currently sets up the spambots, and so they will turn a blind eye to it just so their community can grow. Allowing bot posts is too ripe for abuse, which is why I think the repost bots (again, not all bots) should be banned altogether with extreme prejudice.

There's no reason that the good stuff should only be in the comments, I don't want to end up in a situation where the only way to make things usable here is to block the biggest communities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is why I stopped development of BotIt, if people don't want it then I won't continue making it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think you should hang it all up yet.

Thinking aloud - I have a few ideas where bots would be beneficial with targeted criteria from a handful of reasonably decent sources.

It's not necessarily a bad thing to snatch and dump news from their sources for news mags...

Webcomics, podcasts.. there's probably a ton of reasons it wouldnt be spam. Digests instead of multiple posts?

As long as the bot(s) discriminate and segregate, they could really do some good work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I am really opposed to using bots to take popular news from Reddit and dump it in our main news subs. It's a poisoned chalice.

In the 8 years I was on Reddit the quality of world news in the main worldnews sub dropped. In the last year I stopped contributing because there was no point.

It used to be news from around the world. Sometime during the Trump/Anti Trump era it slowly got drowned out by the political agendas of various factions of paid shills and bots.

If you look at it now, most of it is Ukraine war news. Basically the facebook crowd vote up what they feel comfortable with from the US news cycle, and the propaganda bots vote up anything that meets their agenda.

I don't think we should let them set the agenda here too. Reproducing their selections would have that effect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apologies. I thought I was pretty clear about direct links to sources that were specifically targeted for their audiences.

Full agreement on leaving reddit with reddit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sorry for the misundertanding. Now that I read it again I can see what you were saying.

I'm fediversing with my morning coffee, and should probably drink more of it before hitting the reply button!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Agreed. I've seen some interesting posts, but I usually won't comment because it's just going to get spammed out by the next bot post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

memes are reposts though tbh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Strongly disagree. And I don"t think that this has anything to do with Reddit in particular.

The Fediverse is designed to host many different types of content. Some content is going to be content that one person or another doesn't like.

And that is fine. Those people don't need to consume that content. They don't have to look at that content.

But they should not be trying to prevent other people from looking at that content.

In your case, it sounds like you got into a disagreement with the moderators of a Fediverse community over what content should be in that community. End of the day, their role is to make that call. You don't like it, go make another community, and if users generally agree with you, they'll come to your community instead.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί