this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
188 points (95.2% liked)

Games

17694 readers
1078 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't be that they hired business and psychology people only to come up with such a retarded cost. My guess would be they intentionally leaked a $100 figure so they could price a barebones dlc at $50 and go 'see, we listened!'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

phew they Didn't do the forbidden paradox

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alright, I'll pay up to $50 for a DLC pack that includes a new continent, at least as much story and content as the current game, at least 2-4 new character classes, and several new game play concepts. If you want me to pay the price for a new game, I need the equivalent of a new game out of it. As for $100, no. Ain't happening.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What is it is 1/3 of a continent, 20% more characters, and 5x more buggy, but... they add more microtransactions to the game so you could give them even more money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I can't wait for Microsoft to take over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not going to buy it, because I don't like the series or genre. Feels really shallow and repetitive to me.

But in general -- say, assuming some hypothetical developer of a game that I like, sure. I'd buy a $100 DLC. Hell, lots of games have more than $100 DLC (though it's commonly broken up into smaller chunks).

But that sword cuts two ways. The DLC that the hypothetical developer is making has to actually be worth $100 to me. And I can get a lot of really good games for considerably less than $100. Which means that whatever they're coming out with would need to provide a great deal of really good gameplay to be competitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The awnser is no to all DLCs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›