this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8560 readers
666 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Keep the Bradleys coming

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm concerned that the US is satisfied with not sending any more aid now that they've gained all this intel about how their equipment fares against Russian equipment and tactics. Nothing more to be gained besides preventing more western trade routes for Russia. How much money is that worth to the US now?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, there is always more Intel to be gained. We've seen how Russia fares against those weapon systems and now it's a question of how will they change their strategy? If the US makes a prediction about new Russian doctrine, will the US assessment be accurate or does the US intelligence apparatus need to rethink it's analysis procedure. In a conflict heavy with drone usage, what can we learn about their use and more importantly, countermeasures, both on the adversarial side and blue side.

Anyway my point is that there is always more to learn from your opponent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The issues are strictly internal politics.