this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
423 points (94.7% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3280 readers
7 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world/



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 394 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The user was banned immediately. Also rate limiting has been put in place on community creation. (Removing the communities takes some time however..)

[–] [email protected] 89 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hot damn, you are fast. Nice job!

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It happened at least a week ago and the user was banned at the same time

OP is just reposting after the issue was already fixed.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah even if this is a new new account of the same user, we could do without the why haven't they been banned yet. I think we can all agree it takes time for the admins to notice these things - and they're volunteers anyway. They need some leeway

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Why haven't they been banned yet?

Since you banned my main for...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Why haven't they been bann.... Oh, they're banned.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can we have a hard limit on community moderation so we never end up with POWER MODS which were one of the worst things about Reddit moderation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

right? some people spam their own communities daily trying to force traction in them and run like 16 communities.

like fuck off be normal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Damn this is such a good suggestion fr

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

do you also ban the IP or is it too much?

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Lemmy doesn't have an option for that but we're looking into it

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I guess it's achievable with hosting you're using (with nginx ip block list for example if you're using it)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What you're looking for is functionality like fail2ban, but probably with a filter set to the HTTP endpoint for creating communities. Not sure if it will work, I haven't really looked into the Lemmy code/architecture yet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

If they’re using Cloudflare it can do this too. Even the free tier, you can have one monstrously long WAF rule to ban a bunch of IPs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Spammers with a little bit of sanity in them will use VPN providers. The consequence is that IP banning effectively results in blocking VPN servers. For people like me, using VPN connections for genuine reasons (like a provider/government that cannot be trusted), this is problematic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I used to use stuff that had IP banning and it would just mean when I was on mobile data I would just randomly not be able to use it because some dick was wanding around getting IP banned using mobile data.

People warrant IP banning userly are sad enough to find way of circumventing it and it'll probably just makes issues for other users instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It's so easy to change your IP address. All you'll end up doing is banning a dynamic IP that someone else will get at some point

[–] [email protected] 124 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It blows me away that 1) people can get so buthurt 2) have the mentality of a small child.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 2 years ago

Having lived through the last 20 years, neither of those surprise me at all anymore lmao

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago

It blows me away that the richest person in the world is one of those...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's not the mentality of a small child that's the mentality of someone who actively refuses to take their medicine. There definitely has to be some underlying problem with them, if I were this mad I 1. wouldn't do this and 2. would be over it within 2 minutes at most. This user can get fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Jeez. What a pathetic loser.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

I can smell the cheetos-stained fingernails from here.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems he's been trying to mess with any instance he gets an account on, I know sh.itjust.works was spammed with "LMAO" communities as well as one other instance iirc

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Can’t even imagine why someone would waste their time like this. The instance is basically a non profit run by volunteers who believe in the technology…so let me just spend hours of my life trying to be a dick to them

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 years ago

Oh, that guys back? Yea he has some problems. We just let him think he's doin something.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They should be charged for trying to attack a service using malicious practices. People only learn when their actions have consequences.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

Agreed. People still think they’re invincible on the web. Tell that to a bouncer at a club or the police. They will f*** your s*** up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People only learn when their actions have consequences.

The sentence ... is death.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/SLkHd-m7o3s?t=119

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure but this won't stop until it's not possible or worth the effort/resources. So I'm wondering if there's a technical restriction that could be put in place for such behavior. Maybe instances should just start limiting the number of new communities someone can create in a certain amount of time on their instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I think one of admins commented saying he added in the last thing, saying there's a delay but it takes time to delete the existing spam communities

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Hexbear had a nerd like this in the first year, must have been 3 years ago now. They spammed John Kerry pictures and did it every single day for like 10 months.

Serious waste of time/life.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 years ago

Is there a way to add this as a bug or feature request list for Lemmy? This seems like a concern that will need to be addressed at some point in the future. Maybe opening up communities created by banned users. Or adding a feature where users can report rogue moderators and allow communities to be liberated from rulers who become malicious or have their account hacked?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

this makes it more or less impossible to search for Communities with numbers in the name at least for me because they have random strings of numbers in the description.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Would blocking the user also block the communities they made?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It really should, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I could see a case where someone creates a community, it thrives, then the creator turns out to be a butthead that needs banning. It happened to a subreddit I mod.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

How sad your life can be to wanting to claim com name to proove your existence?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He made it impossible to search for wefwef before the name change

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

fortunately the name changed to Voyager. Reachable at the following URLs vger.app m.lemmy.world

community: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Vger.app? My Star Trek senses are tingling.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

V'ger and Voyager are both Star Trek references. I assume that it was done intentionally, but it's cool with me either which way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ruud took care of it a week ago. They answered elsewhere in the thread. OP posted this without bothering to check if it had been handled.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Maaan, that karma whore habit is hard to drop β€” even on a site devoid of any viable analog to it. πŸ€¦πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί