this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
288 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
4910 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Samsung Boss said:

As soon as you have sensors to capture something, you reproduce [what you’re seeing], and it doesn’t mean anything. There is no real picture.

A Polaroid photograph is a real picture, in the sense that it exists as a single, definitive, physical thing. Whether what it shows is real is a different question, though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't really understand what is unethical about AI photo edit to begin with? Like photo editing before AI existed and you could make anything you want with a ps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it's not automatic and is outside of the user's control, to start.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Besides potential copyright infringement, there isn't really any issue with it I'd say. This is still an incredibly stupid take from Samsung however.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Im 14 and this is deep

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›