this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Ottawa

1076 readers
16 users here now

News, events, discussions, and what not from Ottawa, Ontario.

Municipal website: https://ottawa.ca/


Rules

  1. Be polite and respectful.
  2. Please only post content relevant to the City of Ottawa or to its residents.

Ottawa on the Fediverse:

empty

Ottawa chatrooms:

Please note the following:

* All chatrooms are linked together. If you join one room your messages will be copied to the other platforms.

* Matrix is an open source and potentially distributed chat protocol. The matrix room listed is hosted on matrix.org, a somewhat centralized hub for a lot of currently public rooms. Though the protocol itself is free, libre and open source, the deployment of the protocol resembles a centralized service. This may be fixed in the future with the deployment of independent servers.

* Be aware that both Telegram and Discord are centralized proprietary platforms and do not necessarily protect your rights nor privacy while simultaneously giving power to corporations.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On January 8, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) approved plans for a nuclear waste disposal facility at the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) site at Chalk River. The near-surface facility located about 160 kilometres northwest of Ottawa would feature a mound holding up to a million cubic metres of low-level radioactive waste about one kilometre from the Ottawa River.

The site was chosen for its proximity to existing waste sites at Chalk River Laboratories, where the federal government once operated nuclear reactors and over eight decades of nuclear waste accumulated. A former senior manager said the waste proposed for this facility is “intermediate level” and requires underground storage in a facility planned to be as deep underground as the CN Tower is tall.

The site is bordered by wetlands that drain into the Ottawa River, the water source for millions downstream. Citizens are also concerned that the underlying bedrock is porous, with the groundwater table very close to the surface.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't there a better spot to dispose of nuclear waste than near a river? Come on!

[–] BedSharkPal 1 points 11 months ago

Seriously. What's the thought process here? I must be missing something. I'm assuming it is cheaper somehow?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But nuclear power is perfectly save and is the best thing for us right now. /s

[–] veeesix 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is generally safe, but the issue here is essentially pooping where you keep your clean drinking water.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

If only there was a way to produce energy that didn't require "pooping" on our world, that was cheaper, easier to permit, faster to build and could be built as a distributed system (so as not be become a terrorist target). Too bad the choice is only nuclear or fossil fuels. /s