this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
233 points (96.0% liked)

News

24686 readers
4132 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The geneticist Jim Wilson, at the University of Edinburgh, was shocked by the frequency he found in the U.K. Biobank, an anonymized research database: One in 7,000 people, according to his unpublished analysis, was born to parents who were first-degree relatives—a brother and a sister or a parent and a child. “That’s way, way more than I think many people would ever imagine,” he told me. And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

Most of the people affected may never know about their parentage, but these days, many are stumbling into the truth after AncestryDNA and 23andMe tests.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 10 months ago (3 children)

One in 7,000 people, according to his unpublished analysis, was born to parents who were first-degree relatives—a brother and a sister or a parent and a child. “That’s way, way more than I think many people would ever imagine,”

Now I'm not walking around thinking I'm living in a porn movie, but a rate of 0.014% is not what I would call shocking.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (15 children)

And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

Either way, what number of parent raping and impregnating their child or sibling raping and impregnating their sibling would be shocking to you? Because to most people it's probably "anything that isn't zero".

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's shocking to you that rape exists? Clearly its a bad thing and shouldn't happen, and it's upsetting, but I would disagree that most people would be shocked if you told them "more than zero rapes happened this year".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

While I agree with you in principle, I actually do think that 1/7k is unexpectedly high. If 1/10k people had an incestuous relationship, that would be low enough that I wouldn't find it surprising. This study, if we take it to be cross-sectional, implies that the rate of incidence is much higher, at least on the order of 1/1k, possibly something around 1%. I don't know the frequency that people of incestuous individuals have a child as a result, but the idea of it being higher than 1/7 strikes me as unlikely. Of course, multiple children can result from a pairing, so that has the potential to sway the numbers, but I'd hope that incestuous individuals are less likely to desire children from the relationship, and as a result would take a pregnancy as a sign to stop.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

Meaning that this could be an indication of a wider incest....problem?......trend?.....idk....

Edit: it was literally the next sentence....

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Given the number of blathering idiots there are, I'm kinda surprised inbreeding isn't even more common.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I’ve been thinking it’s pretty common for a while, just because of how common a version of it with plausible deniability for the downsides (step siblings, etc.) is in porn. I know people say it’s just to appeal to people who really like it and the rest can just mute, but that’s very unconvincing. I always have porn muted, because the sounds don’t do much for me and just about every person I talk to about this (not a lot, so grain of salt) is surprised that anyone would mute as a rule. Secondly, I don’t think you really need words to pick up on the incest vibe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My theory about all the step sibling porn is that they’re trying to get you to pay for the “normal” porn. “Yes you can watch it for free…but wouldn’t it be better if it wasn’t so weird?” I don’t think most people find those story lines appealing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sibling or other incestuous roleplay is super common actually. The step sibling stuff on porn sites afaik was once again enforced from their payment providers or advertisers. Because people who aren't related, but acting like they are, are apparently turning the world into Sodom & Gomorrah, and based on some of those weird virgin or conspiracytard comments here it seems that some people actually do believe this too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I think the idea is that step porn is basically just normal porn past the first few opening lines.

Normal people will just skip that bit and watch.

People into incest will watch the first few lines.

Unfortunately, I think a lot of porn makers have tried to split the baby and ended up alienating both audiences. People into incest don't like the whole "step" thing, because it's not real incest. And people who don't like incest don't like the "step" thing, because it's too close to real incest.

Essentially, I think porn producers think it's a moneymaker, but it's really just bad porn production.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait, there are people who don’t mute?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Fellow muter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Incest porn is so disgusting. I don't care if it's fictional, it's still disgusting.

I have no problem with porn in general, but I'm just glad I don't know who gets off on the incest porn.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s 100% not my thing, but, y’know, neither is scat. I’m just assuming someone likes it because it’s everywhere. Another user suggested it’s to get people to pay for non-incest porn, which sounds possible, though the porn companies would have to be willing to collude about that. I’m not sure if that’s likelier than that people are just ashamed about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think a third option is that porn companies think it's what people want whether it is or not and people consume it because it's oversaturated the market.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That’s the thing about it though. It’s pretty easy to see how often a term is searched for, both through your own site and through Google, so these companies know people want it. In fact, Pornhub claims “step mom” is one of the highest searched terms on their site. How’s that for mommy issues.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I’m sure they do a lot more tracking than that. It may also be that some of these niches are more likely to have “whales”. One whale might be more profitable than many/all freeloaders

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

That's the easy and probably true answer. They have tons of data, they know what people actively search for and how often. They wouldn't make it if it wasn't profitable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Or a 4th option. It's just lazy low cost plot writing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s possible, though I gotta assume they use tracking. Actually, I wonder if it’s just as common outside of private mode

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good question. If you're really into incest porn, you might be inclined to do your best to hide it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I just use a private window as a matter of course because I use the auto complete for common websites and I don’t want anything untoward showing up if I’m looking something up in front of people. I gotta assume that’s pretty common, no matter what people are into.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, the bigger problem is when people think a private window does more than forget their search history and cookies on their device

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

The UK actually has a big issue with incest. Especially with cousins. Causes loads of child fatalities.

Really big issue with people from Asia, incest is the norm there.

Edit for those downvoting me is this a recorded issue. It's been in the news. Just because it doesnt fit the narrative or we arent meant to talk about those things doesn't mean it isn't happening.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is the UK like Brazil where cousins relationships aren't illegal?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yes. They aren't illegal apparently. White people in the UK don't marry their cousin from my understanding though. So it becomes racist to infringe on other cultures I guess, eventhough it is the UK and UK culture should be what's important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Fun fact, Charles Darwin married his cousin. It used to be a more common among white Britons (and other Europeans, especially royalty lol), but it's rare now. It is indeed quite common among Britons of Pakistani heritage, buts it's becoming rarer. And the risk of genetic defects is actually quite small. I don't think it can be considered incest when its legal.

There is a theory that the reduction in cousin marriage in Europe reduced the power of clan groupings and led to the more indivualistic liberal culture we have now, with both good and less desirable effects (basically, more freedom but weaker communal bonds)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If 1/7000 kids are the product of incest, I'm guessing that 1//500 have been lied to about their biological father; looking at you royal family of England.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Well there's 8 billion humans and 331 million Americans so

Over a million humans and almost 50k Americans.

Rad

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

A bit off topic but, here is the latest episode from the podcast Citations Needed. They talk about the Atlantic's shitty politics. It made me not want to give them any views.

https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/episode-198-how-the-atlantic-magazine-helps-sell-austerity-and-war-to-middlebrow-liberals

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's the equivalent to take me home country roads in UK? I think it deserves one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Heave me 'ome, Bri*ish raaaaail.

To tha' place, sisters thooong.

Git no charisma, so mountin mama!

Take me load, sitting on my chode!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Perfect 👌

load more comments
view more: next ›