jeffw

Isn’t there a thing where they think that the US wasn’t founded in 1776 and there’s some alternate nation and we know because the flag has gold trim? Idk, something like that

So… to summarize the argument: we have to build nuclear plants, even though they are the most expensive renewable per kWh and they take the longest amount of time to build (even by the author’s “fast” timeline standards) because we don’t have batteries that can store wind and solar energy, even though there are multiple emerging potential solutions that could result in days-long storage capacity.

Not buying it. I don’t buy the “unsafe” argument but I also don’t buy this argument

Edit: this same publication that published this op-ed published a pretty negative review of this book, funny enough: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/jun/02/going-nuclear-by-tim-gregory-review-a-boosterish-case-for-atomic-energy

Iirc, you are disqualified if you puke too soon after

Chestnut has perfected the art of competitive eating

Political martyr and navy vet

The US wasn’t a colony. It was 13 colonies that united.

R2O? Posting biased sources? No way /s

I can stand up for what I believe in. Does that mean I should be written about in a major news outlet?

Regardless of whether you like it, it’s hard to deny that it’s becoming super popular

Weird, I was listening to them on Spotify a couple weeks ago.

No offense, but they aren’t exactly a big deal. Unless you’re super into the 90s/00s noise rock scene ig

Donald Trump transferred to Penn

Well no, the issue is the kids being exempt from reading them as part of a lesson or from being read to during story-time. They aren’t saying the books must be physically removed.