this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
642 points (89.4% liked)

General Discussion

12300 readers
118 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
  • Democratize the workplace.

There are probably many ways you could go about this: Requiring that employees have a representative on the board of all corporations, forcing companies to give a certain amount of equity to employees, all businesses have to be worker co-ops, maybe some kind of automatic unionization? The point is to give workers more say in how businesses are run and a fairer cut of the value they produce, which would probably end up fixing some of the other things on this list as a byproduct.

  • News reporting must be factual and clearly distinguishable from opinion and other non-news programming.

Something needs to be done about deliberate propaganda and misinformation. I'm not sure what the answer is here, but maybe having some rules for what can be called "news" would be a start.

  • Enumerated right to bodily autonomy

This would cover abortion, prostitution, and marijuana consumption, and would also cover many forms of trans healthcare that are currently under attack. Speaking of which...

  • Strengthened protections for minorities, including legal recognition of trans and intersex people. Something like the Equal Rights Amendment but for all minorities. Let's explicitly get it into law that you can't discriminate based on something people are born with.

I don't agree with merging the House and Senate; uncapping the House fixes the proportionality issue and the Senate is a useful check to ensure that smaller states still have a voice.

Adding 5% to the highest tax bracket seems way too low. There should be a new top bracket with a rate so high it's almost confiscatory; anyone earning that much is a resource hoarder and should be made to share with the rest of society. We used to have a top tax rate of 95%, so this isn't unrealistic.

Banning tax prep is redundant if the IRS is calculating it for you, and I wouldn't want to outright ban it for those whose financial situations may be complicated enough to actually need it.

Why are we including a ban on tipping? I feel like we're getting lost in the details here. This should be a shorter list of high-level changes. If you don't like tipping, wouldn't it be better to do something about employers not giving fair wages in general?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (10 children)

How you gonna afford all the social schemes with no tax under $50K? I have "free" healthcare but it's 2% of my taxable income. The taxable brackets start at $18,200 ($11,880 USD) here. You'll need to ensure there is finance for social services else you'll be bringing harm to your society in the form of failed infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Tax the rich

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Decommodify housing as well

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

No employee, owner, shareholder, investor, contractor, etc. can make more than 50 times the amount of the lowest paid employee, contractor, supplier employee, supplier's supplier employee, etc. (Including all of the foreign slaves).

Tim Cook wants to earn 50M per year? Then all of those Foxconn guys that they need nets to stop from suiciding need to make at least 1M. All of the guys making chips have to make 1M. All of the guys mining coal to produce the electricity have to make 1M.

Income inequality problems would be abated. "Dey took our yobs." would be less of a problem because you would save money by using local labor due to lower shipping costs. Poverty would eventually be eliminated.

Probably communism with extra steps, but maybe it would be less prone to party dictators.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly at this point the only thing you are keeping is the English language.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ranked choice voting is clearly a better choice than plurality voting, but if you're not familiar with STAR voting, please check it out:

https://www.starvoting.org/star_rcv_pros_cons

https://youtu.be/oFqV2OtJOOg?si=pQ1R3wpPmzOcaO17.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Dude I'm voting for you

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)

dunno how you mandate people vote. the rest looks like an ambitious but overall laudable start.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Australia already does it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Can you please create a community for this? I'd love to be able to discuss each point separately, and suggest others.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Why would a two party system implement ranked choice if everyone is stupid enough to keep voting for them? They're not going to shoot themselves in the foot.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It all starts with the top - proportional representation.

It still amazes me that states have those proposition votea/referenda started by petitions and yet there isn't a movement to get proportional representation on the ballot? Or if there is it seems pretty quiet from outside the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So, some of these are great. And some of them are so unrealistic they will NEVER happen in a trillion universes. I don't think it's healthy or productive to conflate great talking points with this crud because it just devalues the argument as a whole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Convert corporations into Worker Consumer Cooperatives to prevent investor wealth accumulation and regulatory capture and align business towards worker and consumer interests rather than short-term profit seeking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

MANDATORY voting... Let's be real, we have people who are unable to read the candidates' personal statements, you really want them voting?

That'll be used to get President Camacho legislating Mandatory plant watering using Gatorade.

[–] howrar 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The way I see it, mandatory voting is to ensure that everyone is capable of voting. It prevents problems like employers not giving people appropriate time off for voting. The trade off is of course that you'll have people voting more or less at random, or just going with whatever candidates their tribe is voting for without thinking. I suspect the latter averages out to a much smaller effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Should also include "tax the church"

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

i think your biggest problem is how you are getting any of this done with opposite financial incentives in the way without a literal revolution.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Start with one thing, mate. Most impact and easiest to implement.

Why delude yourself with this bullshit fantasy list? Focus on reality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure this is ranked by biggest impact to smallest

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

No. You keep treating the symptoms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thank you for this approximate description of most Nordic countries.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί