this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2022
12 points (80.0% liked)

World News

33613 readers
1118 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Time and time again.

Every accusation is an admission with the West.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly this

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

At least the US doesn't harbor cybercriminals that target civilian infrastructure like Russia does. Hospitals, schools, and banks have all been harmed with the full approval of the Russian government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

reuters is just reporting on a blog article, and assuming that the people who published that blog are what they say they are.

this is tabloid level nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fine, do your own damn search, it's not hard. Russia cybercrime ransomware. This is a well known tactic by the Kremlin.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a well known propaganda tactic from American intelligence agencies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And a minimal effort search would bring up dozens of articles about how pervasive this Russian tactic is. I'm not even that dialed into the security community and I've heard plenty about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are any of those articles true?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you doubting this based on expertise or knee jerk suspicion of anything unflattering of Russia?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I'm just saying that I don't trust the word of American government or their affiliates on this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay, this article goes over the justification in more detail.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

BBC is owned by the UK government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for that piece of information. I almost forgot. Now read the damn article, it cites non-governmental sources.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It cites analysis from Chainalysis, a contractor for US government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is there a flaw in the evidence or analysis?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You and I don't know because we don't have access to the evidence ourselves. It's just "Company publishes report supporting the arguments of its large customer".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A blog post that previews the report is here: https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/2022-crypto-crime-report-preview-russia-ransomware-money-laundering/

At this point, I'm not doing any more of the leg work for you. There's plenty of information out there on this. It's widely discussed in the security community. Articles, reports, and the like are not hard to find at all.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago

The company here has a massive conflict of interest. The US government is a big customer of theirs. There is no reason to take anything they say seriously.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cybercriminals like snowden?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

No, more along the lines of ransomware usually. The deal is that they have free range to operate on enemy targets, but they must not attack Russian targets. One piece of ransomware for Windows did this by checking for a Russian language pack.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

You really like low effort dismissals with "NATO" or "US", don't you?