this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
547 points (97.4% liked)

World News

33577 readers
443 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Doesn't it take only 1 of the counties with veto power to shut this down? Why would Russia ever approve?

Edit: Had a brain fart. Thanks for the corrections. Leaving my dumb comment anyway.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Russia isn't in NATO, but they are it's most successful recruiter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Which is why I'm baffled why people still spread the myth that Russia invaded to 'stop nato aggression.'

Like, firstly you're fucking wrong, but if you want to wear that L like a medal then go for it. Russia is the biggest reason the baltics joined.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (7 children)

I'm not sure who would say that it was to 'stop NATO aggression', but it's not hard to imagine it as a some kind of response to NATO's continued expansion around them.

NATO hasn't been in any direct operations against Russia but they have been involved in the ME where they have been active.

I think of it a lot in the same way as the US's pacific ocean and Caribbean territorial expansion and involvement in central america as a response to the Cuban Missile crisis and Soviet posturing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think of it a lot in the same way as the US’s pacific ocean and Caribbean territorial expansion and involvement in central america as a response to the Cuban Missile crisis and Soviet posturing.

The "Cuban" missile crisis was started by USA putting nukes in Turkey.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

NATO not the UN, Russia isn’t a member.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Who gave Russia a veto at NATO?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

SO UN FAIR!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

That's 20 billion per year. The EU's alone defense spending for 2023 was 270bil. This is not a lot of money.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The EU has no defense budget, the member countries have.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, this is less the cavalry is here and more "we've committed 3 peanuts, which is better than no peanuts". It's probably enough to help Ukraine a bit, assuming they can agree to it and fund it as committed.

It's unclear if this is humanitarian, non-lethal or general military aid, from the non-paywalled section of the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

221 days until the next U.S. presidential election

Can Ukraine hold on that long?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (142 children)

If Republicans have a majority in Congress, they'll continue to support Russia.

load more comments (142 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I know NATO doesn't have unlimited resources, but given that this is an explicit proxy war with Russia, doesn't $100bn seem kind of paltry? That makes it appear that they're planning on continuing cash infusions from the US.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

EDIT: I'm saying that the US can't be relied on to continue supporting the war effort because the GOP in particular has become increasingly opposed to funding it.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›