this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
569 points (100.0% liked)

196

17027 readers
1213 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is what we call a hot take

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Not as hot as earth if we trigger a runaway greenhouse effect!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Me when I'm hungry

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was curious where this image came from and, oh god

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

What in tarnation?!

[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago

Literally animal farm!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Litterally The 1975

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

read animal planet by jorjor well recently. lot of stuff in there yall could learn from tbh.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Interesting that it could be read not only as a climate change joke, but also a disinformation joke, given what she's reading from.

~~People seem to not realize that the government wasn't the one burning books in Fahrenheit 451...~~

Edit: Been awhile for me - but this does not seem to be true.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

People seem to not realize that the government wasn't the one burning books in Fahrenheit 451...

Who controlled the "firemen?" Who outlawed books?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The book is clear that people stopped reading books on their own, then came to distrust them, and then pressured the government to outlaw them. It wasn't top-down like you might expect in an authoritarian society.

TBH, the book is a lot of "old man yells at cloud". Bradbury wasn't even that old at the time he wrote it, but it comes off that way.

One thing I think makes a good point is porches. Just a place for you to hang out and signal to your neighbors that it's OK to start up a random conversation as they walk by. Most houses aren't built these days with porches that are particularly usable for that, and setback requirements in zoning often make them legally impossible to add.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know it's been a while since I've read that book, but I'm pretty positive that isn't true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, it's been a long time for me as well and I think I may have picked that idea up somewhere and must have found it attractive enough to supplant the obvious part..

Guess it's time to re-read!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have read it relatively recently, and you're not completely off. The people democratically decided to outlaw books because their society sucked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Ah glad to know I wasn't too far off the mark

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Literally a brave new world