this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2022
11 points (92.3% liked)

Asklemmy

46336 readers
742 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

If people feel the need to shoplift, chances are they aren't being provided for by society. I would look to wages and employment first.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes, always. Shoplifting from anything but a good worker-owned enterprise is entirely supportable assuming it's not just like a mom and pop with zero employees other than the mom and pop.

The entire existence of capitalism is tightly coupled with mass worker exploitation through the theft of the surplus value generated by workers.

Edit: I don't even care if they aren't in poverty, I still support them, especially from trash like Target.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

If a person needs to resort to stealing essential supplies, they're not a failure, it's society that's failing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

In general I'd say no, but in cases of necessity such a defense should be applicable to reduce or alternate the consequences.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Yes, if they are going without food or other essentials.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

It depends on what is being stolen. It's a difference if you steal an essential food item or a bottle of perfume.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, it should always be.

And even if someone isn't in poverty, shoplifting is just cool and based.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Only as a mitigating factor if the stolen good is an essential product.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Food and clothing. Other then those, no.