this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
34 points (80.4% liked)

politics

19930 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In public, President Biden and corporate America appear to oppose each other’s interests and blame each other for the economy’s problems.

In private, Biden and the business community have been ramping up collaboration, especially on infrastructure goals.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

So, part of how Biden funded his massive programs on climate change and domestic manufacturing was through a massive corporate tax increase. For one look at the impact, you can check out Amazon's taxes paid per quarter which show a huge spike at the beginning of 2023 when the new taxes went into effect.

Corporations actually should be happy about that tax policy, since building a working economy is also to their benefit even if they have to pay some taxes to make it happen (as opposed to just putting 100% of the burden on the working class until everything at all levels collapses, which is pretty much the point we've reached as of today in this country). But painting Biden as a solely corporate-focused candidate of a piece with the norm for US politicians is, like a lot of emotionally-resonant criticisms of him that get repeated multiple times a day here for some perfectly organic reason, pretty much the opposite of the truth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The increased corporate tax also helps offset the tax breaks that sub-$400k earners will see this year. He had to wait until Trump’s disproportionate tax cuts for the wealthy expired before his could go into effect. His new plan really cracks down on the top bracket and billionaires, so that’s good news for us, but not so great for executives. There’s also a 4x increase on stock buyback tax for corporations.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/11/fact-sheet-the-presidents-budget-cuts-taxes-for-working-families-and-makes-big-corporations-and-the-wealthy-pay-their-fair-share/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah, true dat.

There's a ton of stuff in the budget proposal for this year that goes a bunch further; I just didn't feel like it was completely fair to claim credit for stuff that hasn't happened yet. The corporate minimum tax is already happened. But yeah, this year's proposal is way more.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Silly non sequitur. Even in his State of the Union he gave his position on his support of corporations but the need to keep them reigned in, primarily through taxes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Are they not happy with four years of straight, no-strings-attached handouts?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Which was exactly like Pelosi and Trump's relationship. On camera was all RESIST, off camera gave him everything he wanted.