this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2022
4 points (62.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44796 readers
955 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No? That really depends on the person who's traveling. Saying that all tourist are obnoxious is a fallacy.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What? Saying that saying that is a fallacy is a fallacy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I may have worded my comment erroneously. What I was trying to say is that not all tourist have to be, by definition bad people.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You are right and they aren't "bad people", they are just annoying ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hmmm, most of them? Probably, (I live in a touristic place.) but not all. We can't just generalise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Depends on what the end goals are. If it is to generate tourism, of course.

And what do you mean by "evil"?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My guess here is β€œevil” is the ecological impact of travel. High CO2 outputs from aircraft and prolonged automobile travel.

The rebuttal is: take lower carbon impact travel options.

IMO, traveling is inevitable and, maybe, necessary. There are few other ways to experience a culture and understand a people without it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My guess here is β€œevil” is the ecological impact of travel. High CO2 outputs from aircraft and prolonged automobile travel.

But that's a problem related to transportation in general. Not due to tourism. Aside from that we really need to switch out current ways of transportation to better, safer and clean ones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

It may be necessary for some economies, but otherwise it's also inevitable. At the very least it must be tolerated

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I live in a big tourist area and american/German tourists are the stereotype you imagine them to be

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Tourism isn't evil.

Tourism-centric economies that ignore the needs of local population to serve tourists and make money (... Therefore Capitalism) is evil. Car/plane centric infrastructure that greatly increases CO2 production (.... Therefore CapitalismΒ²) is evil.

Travel and tourism are, in and of themselves, positive and enriching, if you somehow divorce them from said capitalist forces.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah. Tourists are annoying, and can kill your culture. But they pay the bills.