Fediverse stuff

@[email protected] Even more directly projects that claim to work on privacy missions cannot resist littering their Cloudflared website with Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and other garbage antithetical to their mission.

I can understand to some extent them having a presence in those shitty walled gardens for outreach to those misled audiences, but when they proactively link into those shitholes from their public-facing website, it’s obviously quite disgusting.

RMS gives good guidance in this scenario:

https://stallman.org/facebook-presence.html

The links should go one-way: from the walled-garden to the free world.

@[email protected] it's an attempt at a power grab Aral, even Meta aside, it is an illegitimate attempt to take over the cultural and technological aspects of decentralised social communication. Only makes sense that they're partnering up with a bully to fund their mission. Read their founder's bio on Fedi, he thinks he owns ActivityPub, unchallenged by even the author or co-editors, W3C, etc and now he wants to set the tone for the Social Web and Fediverse.

What happening? I'm out of the loop.

@[email protected] Here’s an interesting example. This is a government agency tasked with defending digital rights in #Belgium:

https://www.mediateurtelecom.be/article-rapport-annuel-2023/

As you can see, they don’t merely have a link to their FB account. They actually direct the public to go to #Facebook and #MS #LinkedIn to get /public/ information (that is, info intended for the general public). I am blocked from the publications on that page because I do not have FB or LinkedIn.

WTF.

public money → public agency → private #walledgarden.

@[email protected] what else could #SWF do if they join the fedivirce then the network effect keeping them in metas grasp will losen and we will get many more users

@[email protected] they’re only too eager to help Meta do a bit of the ol’ reputation laundering, I guess