hmm this looks cool, but I would rather go with something like the reform 2 computer that actually looks like I could repair it if something broke https://mntre.com/media/reform_md/2020-05-08-the-much-more-personal-computer.html
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2021
27 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
35689 readers
264 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Something I found interesting: The Reform 2 uses a system on module with soldered RAM and processor on a carrier board, while this uses a motherboard with soldered processor but replaceable RAM. They have two different models of upgradability, both with pros and cons.
You can only replace the entire compute module at once on the Reform but (AFAIK) the interface is an industry standard so there is more than one manufacturer, whereas with the Framework, you have to hope that they keep making upgraded, and more importantly, compatible main boards, but you can upgrade the RAM in the meantime.
Thoughts on which one is better?
I think reform is bound to this method because they need open-source processor, which means arm, which means compute modules with soldered ram. They would certainly have done it with swappable ram if there was a way I bet.
Compute modules also have some other advantages, like being able to add extra hardware if the user's workload requires them. It also means upgrading the compute hardware doesn't mean also having to replace peripherals on the carrier board. Plus, with the demise of Moore's law, I feel like by the time a processor becomes so outdated that it needs to be upgraded, the RAM would need to be, too.
I had this hypothetical idea of a hybrid system where you had a compute module with some RAM, and then a RAM slot on the carrier board that you can populate, so you get the best of both worlds. Not sure if it's possible with current hardware, but what would you think of that?
they need open-source processor, which means arm
How is ARM open source? It's proprietary "IP"
cool, I haven't heard about this before.
Dang, and I just bought a new laptop :(
Hopefully the USB-C port can handle external GPUs, but even without that I'm still interested to see where this goes.
I was recently looking into getting an eGPU for my laptop.. boy did I pick the wrong time to try
Are the PCBs, firmware, connectors, mechanical design FLOSS/open hardware and/or protected from patents?
I doubt it. That doesn't appear to have been the goal.