this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1174 readers
4 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


Share this community: [[email protected]](/c/[email protected])


Serious Linguistics community: [email protected]


Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Inspired by Reddit post of the last month)

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Looks like the sound holes of a violin to me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Oh look, it's a music major.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they are not. Those are called f-holes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

F-holes are the name specifically for the holes in the violin family and the contrabass. The more general term is sound hole, which also includes the c-holes of the viol family or the large round hole of a guitar.

F-holes, in particular, are shaped pretty much exactly like an integration sign.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks to my TI-89 I got a 3 on the AP Calc test and still don't get this joke.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

AP scores go from 1 to 5, with 5 being the best. A 3 indicates an average score. It will most likely not be enough to pass out of a college course, unless the university is less intensive in its calculus courses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's merely a slightly longer sum, so what's the problem?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get the feeling you haven't solved many.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean they're right, Leibniz used a modified s for summa, sum. And an integral is just a sum, an infinite sum over infinitesimal summands, but a sum nevertheless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, they are right about that being the general concept. I only take issue with the implication that it's equally simple.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a curious and needlessly judgmental reply!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No judgement, but you should know it's not that simple. You can't just pull out your calculator and add together an uncountably infinite collection of values one-by-one.

I mean, you could add together a finite subset of the values, which turns out to be the only practical way fairly often because a symbolic solution is too hard to find. You don't get the actual answer that way, though, just an approximation.

The actual symbolic approaches to integrals are very algebra-heavy and they often require more than one whiteboard to solve by hand. Blackpenredpen "math for fun" on YouTube if you want to see it done at peak performance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

ACKTUALLY neither. It's most simply thought of as a limit of progressively longer sums. Infinitesimals help people understand ~~but they're kind of logically questionable.~~

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Actually that last point isn't quite right, in the 1960s Robinson proved that the set of hyperreals were logically consistent if and only if the reals were.

This put to rest the age-long speculation that the hyperreals were questionable.

This speculation is a pain in the ass since it means that we primarily use limits when talking about this sort of thing.

Which is fine, but infinitesimals are the coolest shit ever

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nerd. Just shh away and be quiet

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does the symbol mean in linguistics?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly, it's IPA for "sh" sound.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

voiceless post-alveolar fricative :)