this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

9112 readers
1383 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

If AMD can’t finally compete in the budget segment they are going to be in real trouble.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] weew 5 points 1 week ago

Making shit up as they go along.

They could just release early, with pricing as low as they are willing to go. If they really were trying to "cater to the masses" like all their marketing has been about, they would be comparing themselves to Intel's Battlemage.

They could come out and strike first against Nvidia with an unbeatable price.

Instead they are trying to position it as high and expensive as possible and ride Nvidia's coattails.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

At least it gives me time to get the rest of the PC and save for the GPU but ... if it's not better than my current 7800 XT there's not much use in that...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

The consensus seems to be that AMD priced their cards higher expecting Nvidia to price higher than they did.

Then Nvidia priced lower than they expected (still too expensive imo) and AMD needed to react and price their card cheaper. Problem is retailers already paid for shipments so AMD needed to settle some sort of reimbursement process for the soon to be out of pocket retailers.

This was a big issue for them, but also they realised they could generate more frames if they wanted to, and match Nvidia so they would be able to also claim crazy high FPS figures (it's all nonsense, we care about raster performance).

To be able to do this they needed a couple of months to dev and test it before reviewers get it.

So delaying launch let's them solve both problems with the extra time, but in reality they are missing a window to gain market advantage while also being able to align the narrative with what gamers care about (pure raster performance).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

9070xt? Did they get slapped by nvidia?

Or 9800xt?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

They took NVIDIA's hand and slapped themselves with it. AMD said they changed the name, to better compare to their competitor.

Next generation we'll get R580 to better match with Intel, since they seem like the closer competitor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

No price tag, no specs, no GPU.