this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

972 readers
187 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

With legislation such as the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) now in force, customers and resellers alike are expecting more detailed carbon emissions reporting across all three Scopes from suppliers and vendors, according to Canalys.

This expectation of transparency is increasingly important in vendor selection processes because customers need their vendors to share specific numbers to quantify the environmental impact of their cloud usage.

"AWS has continued to fall behind its competitors here by not providing Scope 3 emissions data via its Customer Carbon Footprint Tool, which is still unavailable," Caddy claimed.>

"This issue has frustrated sustainability-focused customers and partners alike for years now, but as companies prepare for CSRD disclosure, this lack of granular emissions disclosure from AWS can create compliance challenges for EU-based AWS customers."

We asked Amazon why it doesn't break out the emissions data for AWS separately from its other operations, but while the company confirmed this is so, it declined to offer an explanation. Neither did Microsoft nor Google.

These companies operate as if they are above the law. Why would you try and hide the emissions data? Everyone know it is likely very large and growing rapidly, what is there to hide?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We have a lovely backup generator on site that turns on anytime an electrical storm is detected within 50km of our DC. That thing is something out of a cruiseship so yeah, I can imagine real huge data centers must be an order of magnitude worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

No shit, 2025 is coming strong