For a little context, the "Tiktok Ban" is currently in full effect. The bill didn't ban titktok. It banned US businesses from hosting the application unless it was sold. The app is off all the playstores as the law required. This article is about whether Trump might again allow US businesses to host the application under different circumstances than the law mandates.
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10223 readers
319 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Interesting. I guess tiktok should just provide PWA.
This 2020 meme popped up in my memories today ...