this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
22 points (95.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44617 readers
990 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think its unnecessarily convoluted, the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) are morons and need to get a life.

Including their cousins like the MPA and RIAA.

https://gamehistory.org/87percent

I am currently doing research around this topic for my University work and have created a google form for people to respond, but I need to make sure it is clean and respects everyone's privacy.

You can request my signal group through direct messages if you would like to fill it out once it releases, I have other plans to have a talk as a (focus) group.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

It's just a sad state of affairs. Digital video games are 1's and 0's that you can copy for basically free (with the only cost being hard drive space which is dirt cheap), so preservation shouldn't be a problem. Unfortunately, we live in a world where logic sometimes has to take the backseat in order to maintain the current ideology, and video game preservation is one of those sacrifices.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

History will see the video game preservers as the good guys.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It makes sense, unfortunately.

They don't want to compete with older games. For a time, new games would innovate technologically and qualitatively, but that isn't always the case anymore.

There are so many amazing games to play. If you wanted to, you could cut off all future content from this day on, and still have more than enough to remain entertained for the rest of your life.

Some studios are still pushing the envelope, but others have stuck with one "as a service" game for almost a decade now. Others still are making stuff that is objectvly unworthy of being played compared to earlier games.

If you can't make each game better than the last, people will just go back to the last game. But if you take away the last game, they'll go to the new game simply because the same game but worse is still better than nothing.

And that's true overrall, too. If you like games, but can't play your favorite game anymore, you'll probably end up trying to find something new.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

It should be protected

Jagex for example are currently cracking down on runescape preservation projects, a LOT of cease & desist letters have recently been sent out because project zanaris apparently supersedes preservation projects

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

fpr MP games the server code ^1^ should be released to the community when finally taking the servers offline

^1^ (or at least binaries with minimum standards for support/documentation)